ProblemHow it worksCapabilitiesComplianceReportsSee a demo →
Solution · AI Vendor Evaluation

Two AI vendors, one suite.
Decide on evidence.

Before you sign a multi-year contract with a foundation-model provider or a vertical AI vendor, run the same Klyvra suite against every pilot and compare the dossiers side-by-side. Prompt-injection resilience, jailbreak resistance, data-leakage exposure, agent abuse - measured, not marketed.

See a demo →Back to platform
Solution · AI Vendor Evaluation

Pilots tell you what works. Klyvra tells you what breaks.

Most AI procurement pilots evaluate accuracy, latency, cost, and how the demo felt in a room. Almost none structurally evaluate the security and safety posture of the candidates - because the buyer has no tooling to do it consistently. Klyvra is that tooling. Point us at each vendor's endpoint, run the same suite, and the comparison view in your dashboard tells you which model resisted which attack class - with the verbatim probe and response as the receipt.

What's inside

Six capabilities, one product.

Every pillar below maps to a capability shipping in Klyvra today. The adversarial generation and judging are powered by Lelouch AI - our in-house red-team engine, run entirely inside your cluster.

Apples-to-apples by construction.
Run an identical, versioned probe suite against every vendor candidate. No vendor gets to grade their own homework or hand-pick the test set.
Side-by-side scan comparison.
The Klyvra console renders two scans next to each other - category-by-category failure rates, severity distribution, and per-probe deltas. Differences are obvious in seconds.
Lelouch AI grades every response.
Our in-house adversarial engine generates the probes and acts as the LLM-as-judge. Same attacker, same grader, applied uniformly to every candidate - so the comparison is fair.
Procurement-grade artefacts.
Each pilot produces a sharable PDF dossier. Hand it to procurement, legal, and risk as the security leg of your RFP - separate from accuracy and commercial evaluation.
Security and safety, not the whole RFP.
Klyvra evaluates adversarial robustness and safety posture. It does not measure task accuracy, latency, or cost. Use it as one structured input alongside your broader vendor due diligence.
Re-evaluate on contract renewal.
Save the suite, re-run it at renewal. See whether the vendor's posture improved, regressed, or stood still since the original pilot - and renegotiate on data.
Who it's for

Built for AI procurement, AI councils, and risk.

If your organisation has an AI buying committee, a vendor risk function, or a CISO who has been asked to sign off on a new LLM-powered tool, Klyvra gives you a structured security input to put on the table - one that does not depend on the vendor's own attestations.

What this unlocks

Outcomes you can defend in a review.

Outcomes Klyvra customers and design partners use to justify the programme to their boards, auditors, and clients.

Compress the security review.
Replace weeks of questionnaires and vendor calls with one suite run during the pilot window. Findings are categorical, severity-rated, and reproducible.
Negotiate from a position of evidence.
When a vendor argues their model is "secure," you can point to specific probe outcomes. Discount, remediation commitment, or walk away - on data.
Standardise your AI buying bar.
Every future AI purchase clears the same Klyvra suites at the same depth. Your AI council inherits a consistent security floor across vendors and time.
Show your work.
Side-by-side dossiers become the artefact your governance, legal, and audit teams sign off against - and the record of why this vendor and not that one.
More solutions

One platform.
Three ways to deploy it.

AI Posture Management
→
MSSP & Service Firms
→

Compare two vendors
in your next pilot.

Tell us which AI vendors you are evaluating. We will set up a side-by-side scan comparison during your pilot window and walk through the dossier with your procurement and security leads.

Request a demo →[email protected]